Archive for the ‘Joey K’ Category

A Stand in Afghanistan

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

A Stand in Afghanistan

            Thousands of New Yorkers ran frantically through the streets as smoke filled the air.  Millions of people watched the events taking place in disbelief.  Roughly an hour after two commercial airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center buildings, both plummeted to the ground.  The actions that took place on September 11, 2001 forever changed the mentality of the United States and its citizens.  Americans, who once felt safe flying across the country or leaving for jobs, lost the sense of security previously taken for granted.  They quickly became aware of groups and individuals posing serious threats to their rights as U.S. citizens.  The Taliban, Al Qaeda, and Osama bin Laden soon became household names.  In the span of only a few days, a once powerful nation appeared weak and easily susceptible to attack.

            At this time of vulnerability, rather than crumbling, the country rallied together for one common purpose.  No longer would we allow terrorist organizations to put fear in the hearts of Americans.  Under the leadership of President George W. Bush, the United States launched Operation Enduring Freedom beginning October 7, 2001 in the Middle East.  With the intentions of bringing justice to those who took the lives of thousands of people and becoming the aggressors in the war against terrorism, military forces remain in the Afghanistan region today.  However, after over eight years of combat, the majority of Americans no longer share the same beliefs regarding the war.  Rather than viewing the big picture, they view it as a burden on both the economy and families of soldiers deployed.   In order to achieve victory against terrorist organizations in Afghanistan and the remainder of the Middle East, it remains imperative for the United States to continue fighting in the region. 

            Many reasons justify the continuation of fighting in Afghanistan.  Following the invasion of Afghanistan nearly a decade ago, millions of Afghans put their faith in the United States government to provide them with a better life.  A nation once with little hope now anticipated a life with all fundamental liberties, as they fought alongside Americans.  Although that goal still remains unfinished, the likelihood of it occurring increases greatly with our assistance.  As Thomas Barnett discusses in “Why We Should Stay in Afghanistan,” the departure of United States military units would return Afghanistan to the civil war it faced the past several decades.  Innocent Afghans would become defenseless against brutal attacks of the Taliban regime.  As contemplated by Barnett, the Taliban already has much of the offensive advantage in the region; imagine the departure of U.S. troops (1-2).  Eventually, the United States government would be forced to choose sides in the war, contributing to an even greater conflict than what the U.S. faces today.

            Jerry Guo also mentions another important fact supporting the War in Afghanistan in his article “Optimism in a War Zone.”  At a time when an increasing number of Americans view the war in a pessimistic manner, the percentage of Afghan people supporting the actions occurring in the area continues to increase.  Although increasing only four percent, the survey still provides support that withdrawing forces now would wash away all progress made over several years of hard work.  Another striking feature Guo points out compares the morale of Afghanistan to the remainder of the world.  While most nations see the war as a lost cause, the people surrounded by the fighting every day remain optimistic.  Why should we withdraw troops when those with a close perspective see encouraging signs?

            In her article “Should We Still Be in Afghanistan?” Anne Applebaum examines key opposing points to the War in Afghanistan.  As Applebaum says, the absence of a clear, realistic goal prevents many people from supporting the effort.  For those with information easily accessible, the objective seems clear, but much of the world remains clueless to the reasons for fighting.  For most it’s simply been “the good war,” as opposed to “the bad war,” according to Applebaum (1).  The loss of loved ones also stops many from supporting the war efforts.  They argue that fighting for a country several thousand miles away does not justify the deaths of thousands of U.S. soldiers.  The fact that these troops volunteered to serve their country often goes forgotten.  They knew the risks they faced, including the possibility of leaving their home and never coming back, from the moment they signed the dotted line.  For this reason, those choosing to risk their lives and serve in combat will forever be remembered as heroes. The impact of war on the economy also influences many individual’s beliefs regarding the War in Afghanistan.  According to many experts, the billions of dollars poured into war efforts in the Middle East remains far too much for fighting to continue.  These people face a choice regarding the order of their priorities.  Is the economic well being of the nation or millions of defenseless lives more important to them?

            Throughout humanity, war is described as a “necessary evil.”  In an ideal world, people would coexist despite opposing backgrounds and opinions, with conflicts and violent warfare becoming nonexistent.  The fact remains, however, that these differing beliefs contribute to great struggles for power in areas like the Middle East.  As one of the strongest nations in the world, America must continue to fight for the defenseless and protect those in greatest need.  Americans should not selfishly reject the aid of the Afghan people, but rather embrace their role as defenders.  No one ever described the job in the Afghanistan as an easy task.  As in any war, difficult times face all those fighting.  For the United States to succeed in the area, however, U.S. citizens must be willing to fight through the difficult stretches and once again unite for the same purpose.

 

Works Cited

Applebaum, Anne. “Should We Still Be in Afghanistan?” Slate. NewsBank, 8 Sep. 2009. Web. 22 Nov. 2009

  I was able to borrow some information regarding arguments against the War in Afghanistan.  Although she was not necessarily condoning or condemning the war, she did offer several views of why many oppose it.

Barnett, Thomas P.M. “Why We Should Stay in Afghanistan.” Thomas P.M. Barnett::Weblog, 21 Sep. 2009. Web. 22 Nov. 2009

  This expert provided detailed information about the affects withdrawing American forces would have on the country of Afghanistan.  As he described, it would launch the nation into civil war, and make it nearly impossible for peace.

Guo, Jerry. “Optimism in a War Zone.” Newsweek. NewsBank, 23 Nov. 2009. Web. 22 Nov. 2009

  This recently released article provided surprising information about the attitudes of the Afghan people.  While most have given up on the war, their signs of encouragement provided me with another reason why we should continue to support the war.

Relieving the Pressure

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Relieving the Pressure

            As freshmen at Kentucky Wesleyan, we face several new challenges regarding our college careers.  Curriculum covered reaches a new depth unexplored during high school, and teaching styles of many professors seem foreign.  While facing these unfamiliar obstacles, however, we put additional pressure on ourselves to perform at extremely high levels, undertaking several difficult courses a semester.  In many cases, we choose classes only because of their appearance on a resume and the secure futures associated with them.  The essay “College Pressures” in Seagull Readers provides what I consider beneficial information on how to attack the beginning of our college experiences. Written by William Zinsser, it offers great insight into the typical lives of college students and provides great advice that we should all take into consideration.

            Throughout “College Pressures” Zinsser continuously reiterates the long road with unexpected twists and turns we face during our time in college.  Many students enter with a particular career in mind and leave with an entirely different mindset.  Additionally, he addresses the expectations faced and the additional pressures forced upon on college students.  Without revealing too much information to future readers of the essay; he examines four primary pressures contributing to stressful collegiate lives: economic pressure, parental pressure, peer pressure, and self-induced pressure.  Each type plays its own role in influencing goals and habits of ours and puts impossible expectations on our shoulders.

            Although written three decades ago in a much different atmosphere, “College Pressures” still offers great information to all college students.  The pressures Zinsser describes still remain present today, only to an even greater extent.  In today’s world of competition for the best jobs and opportunities, students feel the need to compete with others in all academic and extracurricular areas.  Instead of focusing on subjects interesting them, they choose to undertake a rigorous class load, only bringing them misery.  Therefore, it seems only proper that before students get knee-deep in an impossible academic course load, they should first read this essay from Seagull Readers so they know the other options that exist.

A Brutal Necessity

Friday, November 13th, 2009

A Brutal Necessity

            In an ideal world, humanity would remain free of conflicts and violent warfare throughout its entirety.  People would coexist despite differing opinions, and confrontation would become a thing of the past.  In actuality, however, war remains a necessity for the protection of freedoms granted to all American citizens.  Differing views and beliefs of various parties contribute to struggles for power across the globe.  Past experiences of civilization only further illustrate the effects of war on society.

            A noticeable trend regarding past wars of society includes the role religion and radical belief systems play in conflicts.  Many radical groups use terror in an attempt to evoke change in lifestyles they view as improper.  This idea served as the platform for the 9/11 attacks conducted by Al Qaeda leaders.  After witnessing Americans choose lifestyles they saw unfit according to their Muslim beliefs, they intended to scare Americans into living “properly.”  Also, as demonstrated in Tim O’Brien’s story, religion plays a part in the items some soldiers chose to carry on their missions.  Being a devout Baptist, Kiowa always carried his illustrated New Testament given to him by his father (355).  In many ways, it provided him with a comfort that his comrades could not offer.

            Another main point emphasized by O’Brien concerns the role items from home play in the daily lives of soldiers.  In many instances, pictures and letters serve as the only source of relief in a place surrounded by despair.  As O’Brien describes, they provide memories of life back home and people awaiting their return.  Although also serving as a distraction, Lieutenant Jimmy Cross’s flashbacks of Martha allow him to momentarily escape the tough situations he faces on a daily basis (362).

            Finally, benefits derived from war should also be taken into consideration.  History offers several examples where difficult wars contributed to stronger groups of people in its aftermath.  Groups often entering as individuals fighting for their own causes, exited as a unified group fighting for one purpose.  During the American Revolution, the United States transformed into a unified group of states fighting for independence.  The results of the Civil War actually strengthened a nation so deeply divided.  Despite numerous lives lost and indescribable brutality, wars nearly always conclude as beneficial to countries as wholes.  Without these conflicts, it is difficult to imagine the implementation of change so effectively. 

 

Works Cited

O’Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. Seagull Stories. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2008. Print.

Modest Beginnings

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Modest Beginnings

Modest Beginnings

Over the past several decades, several notable African Americans have emerged as key public figures in the black community. However, the starts of individuals such as Maya Angelou and Alonzo Adams in their respected professions were far from easy.  Both people had to overcome several odds and hardships to be in the position they hold today.  Maya Angelou’s difficulties as a young child began to take a turn for the better following her graduation.  Angelou describes the entire event as a multiple day affair with people of all ages responsible for different tasks (7).  The vibrant details given, especially regarding the older undergraduates and the refreshments they were making made the enthusiastic atmosphere of the environment evident to the reader.

Alonzo Adams was unable to gain notice among his fellow artists at the beginning of his career.  As “Good in the Paint” states, however, his career jumpstarted with the help of Bill Cosby.  The New York Times article goes on to say that after being offered a fellowship at the University of Pennsylvania and using his work in “The Cosby Show” his work became well known throughout the African American community.  Furthermore, his work has recently reached a new audience of sports collectors, especially the National Basketball Association (26).

Works Cited

Angelou, Maya. (2009). Graduation. Seagull: Essays p.7

“Good in the Paint” found in the New  York Times, March 13,2005, Page 26.